Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Once again another great year of presentations at an RSOL conference. Watched a few so far and will eventually get through the rest.

One thing I want to comment on specifically is the Emily Horowitz presentation. Its good to know that people such as Emily are starting to ask tough questions about the underlying foundations of public opinion and private/government research if and where it exists regarding how sex offense legislation was justified then codified into federal and state laws. Additionally the major admission to there being extremely uncomfortable/taboo issues surrounding human sexual development, exploration, age of consent, nudity, and conflicting, but constantly pushed messages about sex, sexy, personal agency, moral verses immoral thoughts, innocent non harmful behavior verses abuse, trauma, and exploitation, the whole concept of victims and offenders.

Sexual matters can be uncomfortable to discuss in of themselves and when venturing into deeper or darker territory many things are simply not up for discussion except in limited circumstances which end up being of a narrow range that lacks critical details. Every registrant out there has the potential somewhere in their lives to reveal everything they know. I am not talking about being registered, what treatment was/is like, the experience of parole, probation, or supervised release, prison, jail, or the whole legal process leading up to all those things. No I am talking about each person’s actual experiences with whatever it was that you did or were accused of doing. Not oh I touched this person, raped those people, looked at naked images of these individuals, distributed videos of this, got drunk and did blah blah, but really going into intimate details. Thought processes, feelings, goals, interactions with others or lack thereof, comments, questions, concerns, things learned about oneself before, during, and after, things learned about anyone else involved, and so on. Basically everything nobody wants all the information on because its too offensive or inappropriate or not even thought about as relevant. Truthful information is incredibly powerful and I believe, no, I know that others are keeping certain facts hidden from the world or simply those closest because many people are not ready to think about such things let alone talk about them candidly.

Here are three examples of specifics I won’t bring up until I know others are ready to think about them and get warmed up to maybe having a civil dialogue one day.

1. What I specifically was looking for. Unlike most people who have been convicted of possessing child pornography I didn’t seek out the materials I downloaded for sexual reasons. Very briefly I have mentioned hints regarding my intent to those who would be most interested and so far no one has asked the right questions for me to respond to.

2. My discoveries in looking at what I did, gaining access to where I did, and everything else learned that I can’t unlearn. For example I know a few facts about the types of content under the child pornography umbrella that aren’t ever mentioned in main stream stories or reports. One face specifically is the historical likelihood of who would produce one type of content over another. By type I mean the range of activity that a given producer would depict. Crucial differences existed and exist between say an individual creating content merely depicting others, verses a company, verses self created material. The worst of the worst stuff probably doesn’t mostly originate from where most people think. And there are huge implications for the realities of human trafficking/sex slavery as a result.

3. The importance of something in my case that was legal and was my starting point and if things had turned out differently the basis upon which I was going to begin a global world improving movement. See my ah ha moment was not “oh no what have I seen” it was “oh wow I can’t believe nobody else has brought attention to this before”. One person made me do a double take and later three people gave me the real feeling that important sub surface stuff was being completely missed, ignored, or avoided.

Thanks for the awesome videos and fighting for those at a disadvantage.

Very good videos. Thank you for posting them!